Comparative study of denoising techniques for 5G communication at 3.5 GHz

Authors

Keywords:

5G, Denoising, Wavelet, Wiener filtering, Kalman filtering

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of denoising techniques for improving 5G communication at 3.5GHz. A 5G system is simulated in MATLAB with thermal noise, intermodulation noise, and external interference. The wavelet, PCA, Wiener, median, and Kalman filters are evaluated using SNR, MSE, and PSNR. Results show that the Kalman filter achieves the best performance, reducing MSE by 92.5% and improving SNR by 14 dB over other techniques. Under thermal noise, it attained an SNR of 20.47 dB, while for all noise sources combined, it maintained 19.43 dB. Wavelet and median filters performed better under thermal noise, whereas PCA and Wiener filters were more effective for combined noise. These findings provide a quantitative basis for selecting optimal denoising techniques, aiding efficient 5G communication system design.

Dimensions

[1] F. Qamar, M. H. D. N. Hindia, K. Dimyati, K. A. Noordin & I. S. Amiri, “Interference management issues for the future 5G network: a review”, Telecommunication System. 71 (2019) 627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-019-00578-4.

[2] B. Yeo, B. J. Lee & K. Kim, “Channel measurement and characteristics analysis on 3.5 GHz outdoor environment”, First Int. Conf. Green Commun. Comput. Technol. Antenna (2016) 11. [Online]. https://personales.upv.es/thinkmind/dl/conferences/green/green_2016/green_2016_1_30_90038.pdf.

[3] R. He, Y. Mi, L. Xiong et al. “Channel measurements and modeling for 5G communication systems at 3.5 GHz band”, URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (URSI AP-RASC) 2016 (2016) 1855. https://doi.org/10.1109/URSIAP-RASC.2016.7601208.

[4] R. Kalyan & V. Viswanathan, “Noise and telecommunications systems”, Journal of Telecommunications System & Management 3 (2014) e112. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0919.1000e112.

[5] P. Song, Y. Tan, X. Geng & T. Zhao, “Noise reduction on received signals in wireless ultraviolet communications using wavelet transform”, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 131626. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9143082.

[6] Z. A. Mustafa, B. A. Abrahim & Y. M. Kadah, “K11. modified hybrid median filter for image denoising”, 29th National Radio Science Conference (NRSC), Cairo, Egypt 29 (2012) 705. https://doi.org/10.1109/NRSC.2012.6208586.

[7] L. Yao, “Research on denoise methods of channel estimation in OFDM system with high-speed multi-path channels”, Journal of Physics Conference Series 1237 (2019) 032068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1237/3/032068.

[8] S. Sreejith & J. Nayak, “Study of hybrid median filter for the removal of various noises in digital image”, Journal of Physics Conference Series 1706 (2020) 12079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012079.

Published

2025-02-22

How to Cite

Comparative study of denoising techniques for 5G communication at 3.5 GHz. (2025). Proceedings of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 2(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.61298/pnspsc...147

How to Cite

Comparative study of denoising techniques for 5G communication at 3.5 GHz. (2025). Proceedings of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 2(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.61298/pnspsc...147